Suicide Club by Rachel Heng

Amazon Book Depository B&N Goodreads

This post uses affiliate links and may receive a small commission for purchases made through my links at no additional cost to you. Click here for more info.


“Something has to change. In being robbed of our deaths, we are robbed of our lives.”

Suicide Club is a chilling tale of a near-future dystopia where population decline has led to strict Sanctity of Life laws and systems to extend life ever longer. Poetically written, Heng weaves a dystopian nightmare that is plausible; however, I struggled to connect to the story as I had expected to and was left wanting much more.

The novel takes place in a New York City that closely resembles modern day, which both adds to the fear of this potential reality as well as creates a dissonance between the futuristic technologies that are not really explained. There is a lot of jargon used that did not seem to be explained, which I found to be distracting – like DiamondSkin is something that I should be intimately aware of, or that a Tender is something that I personally understand.

Suicide Club is told in two alternating points of view, something that I didn’t realize right away. I found myself confusing backstories and just being confused until I went back and re-read. I love dual-POVs done well, but I struggle when the narrative shift isn’t clearly notated and the perspectives bleed together. The first 20% of the book or so recalls the back histories of the two main characters and I struggled keeping everything straight.

I found myself not really caring much about the characters in the beginning of the book, although by the end I did care a bit for Lea and Anja. For me, the story was lacking in explanation of what steps led the population to this point, the political Ministry and its purpose left largely unexplored. With comparisons to Margaret Atwood, I found this to be particularly disappointing as I find Atwood’s writing to be largely about the political systems as well as the system’s impact on the central characters. I can see what Heng was trying to emulate, but for me it missed the mark.

“Someone once said that death was the best invention life had to offer.”

In my opinion, the overall story would have been stronger if the beginning of the novel spent a bit of time directly exploring the political climate, explaining what it meant to be a lifer or antisanc, how the tests at birth and the numbers play into the scheme of things. I found a lot of compellingly interesting tidbits about society that weren’t explored. What is causing the population decline, what is the history of the Replacement business, why all the laws about taking care of yourself? Why the Lists and WeCovery? In a world where suicide is a sin and used as a form of civil disobedience, I feel that answering some of these questions would have strengthened the narrative. I found the lack of worldbuilding in a near-future dystopia to be the main reason that I struggled to connect with the story, and I was left wanting more.

I found Suicide Club to be an interesting and innovative premise, Heng writes with lyrical prose and I look forward to reading her future work and seeing her develop as a writer. This is more of a story about family and choice and less about the dystopian world. I think readers who are interested in family dynamics and the personal story of the characters will enjoy this book, but those who are looking for a dystopian thriller with political intrigue may be disappointed.

★★★

Thank you to NetGalley and the publisher, Henry Holt & Company, for providing me with an e-arc of this book in exchange for my honest review. You can find information about my rating criteria here.


spacer

Let’s Connect!

Twitter Bloglovin’ Goodreads Pinterest

20 thoughts on “Suicide Club by Rachel Heng

  1. (Danielle) Books, Vertigo and Tea says:

    I love you review!!! Although I do disagree about the politics. Given the overall theme, I felt the decision to omit them was what actually worked for me. But so much of this reflecting back, I can where you are coming from. You uses simple one liners to describe a lot of the jargon like Diamondskin, which for me was brilliant, but could honestly be missed easy I think. I always love seeing how we stack up with books 🖤

    Liked by 2 people

    • Kaleena @ Reader Voracious says:

      I definitely saw those one liners, but for me it wasn’t enough. I don’t know why, but I feel like not going more in depth felt disjointed from the future aspects? Like everything else but these words seemed so much like present day and without the politics I just wasn’t able to fully immerse myself. This is totally a preference though because I like the political aspects of dystopia, and I think that the book blurb doesn’t adequately describe what you are really getting here.. I think I had expectations that just couldn’t be met. But this was a good book and I think people will enjoy it provided they go in knowing what they are getting instead of expecting something in the vein of Atwood’s work.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Norrie says:

    I requested this one on NG. Haven’t got the approval yet tho.
    I really like dystopia and was really excited about this. I saw in other reviews as well that the world building is not so good.
    The family dynamics part could still be interesting!

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Ova says:

    I am reading this currently. It’s interesting, and can’t say it’s bad but not hooked me in enough..I am halfway but agree with world building. Thanks for the excellent review!

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.